The Serengeti Campaign highlighted on Love Animals website has come to an end and I want to thank everyone who contributed. The Africa Network for Animal Welfare — USA and its companion organization in Nairobi continue to monitor the court decision. Over $1,000 was raised and added to the large share already contributed by Serengeti Watch. While we did not reach our goal, each and every donation is recognized as a powerful statement against the destruction of unique African habitat.
Monitoring the court decision, at this stage, means waiting for the court to announce its decision on the appeal brought by the Tanzanian Government that would overturn the earlier decision preventing the construction of a road across the World Heritage Site that is the Maasai Mara and the Serengeti, a vast region within the countries of Kenya and Tanzania.
Poaching of rhinos in South Africa reached a record of 1,215 last year
Tigers have been killed off to a level that is 5% of what the population was a century ago. There are approximately 3,000 tigers left in all the world
Smugglers are learning new tricks to disguise horn and ivory
Asian ivory carvers are moving into Africa to practice their trade
The article is noteworthy because it is describing the lengths criminals pursue to evade detection. All this is fueled by consumer demand for animal parts. Bangles, or bracelets are easily disguised as plastic. There are few techniques for testing the composition of items declared as something that is not horn or ivory. Ivory bracelets are labeled “vintage” or “antique”. Shipping handlers are stymied and have little recourse but to accept the shipment as is. How can they question the age of an item? In practice the burden of proof of age falls to the agent and veracity of the owner shipping the item.
Today, I did a search on eBay and found many bangles for sale that look like ivory. EBay prohibits the sale of ivory on its site because eBay doesn’t accept the documentation of age from owners. I wonder if anything slips through and is published for sale? Perhaps someone reading this blog knows how on-line marketing groups like eBay monitor bangles and ivory-looking objects. I would be interested in knowing more. I don’t want to disparage legitimate dealers, but who monitors the claims that ivory is pre-ban and can they prove it? The volume of pre-ban bangles for sale on the Internet is impressive. I found one pre-ban bangle priced at $700.
Ivory carvers from China moving to Africa to ply their trade is disturbing. It puts tradespeople closer to the source of ivory and bone further encouraging demand. It also suggests the markets in China are expanding. Edmond and Stiles, in their landmark 2008 publication, Ivory Markets in the U.S.A, identified fewer than 200 ivory carvers in this country (pages 21-23). In the U.S., carves worked ivory for knife-handles, billiard cues, jewelery, musical instruments, scrimshanders, restored antiques, netsuke and handgun grips. I’m not aware of an inventory of carvers since this publication which suggests the trades are dying out in the U.S. The news in the BBC article suggest the trade in carving ivory is far from dead.
This is all the more reason for the bringing attention to the expanding markets worldwide. We should not be complacent that the poaching of African wildlife is going away. We might be hopeful the situation is changing. Fewer elephants were poached in Kenya in 2014 than in 2013. However, the observations about animal trafficking and general preparedness to identify, arrest and prosecute criminals is not encouraging.
Finally, selling ivory is still a problem for us in the United States. The purchase of ivory feeds supply lines and commerce requiring more dead elephants. A colleague visited San Francisco California last month (January 2015) and took these store front snapshots. If the American public wants to buy ivory, there still is a lot of it for sale.
June 20, 2014, the long-awaited decision by the East African Court of Justice, on the status of building a 53 km road across the Serengeti is finally in. Judgement-Ref.-No.9-of-2010-Final
The East African Court rules the roadway built to bitumen standard (asphalt on top gravel and sand) across the Serengeti National Park is unlawful and infringes on the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community, Articles 1 and 3.
The Africa Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW), with funding from Serengeti Watch and others, successfully argued that building the road would do irreversible harm to this “World Heritage Property” of “outstanding Universal value” as described by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
This is a big win for environmentalist and the conservation movement in Africa. The court was careful to balance the decision by adding that it did not want to block the development programs of Partner States to its jurisdictional powers. Economic development will move forward and it is encouraged in all of East Africa. This question was one of protecting the environment, the animals, and migration patterns of the hartebeest, wildebeest, zebra and the like, from irreversible harm in the face of human expansion. Balancing commerce with conservation will always be a difficult battle.
This is a defining moment for saving an important part of the ecosystem in East Africa. Congratulations to ANAW, Serengeti Watch, and all those concerned for keeping a few places in the world majestic and untouched.